Global governance: old and new challenges
نویسنده
چکیده
The current world economic crisis has highlighted a profound challenge to conventional thinking on and approaches to human rights, especially the right to development. Human rights, primarily economic and social rights, are based on a theory of constant expansion of the economic pie for all, and the right to development is explicitly predicated on the idea of the nation State leading the ever-increasing process of economic and social well-being of its citizens through international cooperation and solidarity. These assumptions have never been more under challenge than now: perpetual world economic expansion is under threat; the real wealth of the world—not just the economic wealth—may be shrinking rather than expanding; economic and social well-being are more and more undermined for the most vulnerable populations of the world; the role of the nation State is more and more contested as a vehicle for development; and the international community is more divided than ever. The challenge of who is accountable for these worsening outcomes and who will be responsible for ensuring a different and more sustainable future are central questions of governance and, for the purposes of this chapter, of global governance. The right to development could provide a framework for tackling these questions if it is reoriented to include dimensions of limits imposed by social, environmental and political factors.1 Indeed, it was realized from the beginning of the articulation of the right to development in the 1980s that its achievement hinged on deeprooted transformations in the authorities, institutions and processes of decision-making at multiple levels within which nation States pursued their development goals. These levels were not only national and international but also sub-State and within social systems in constant interaction—in other words, a transformation of global governance rather than simply international governance. It is in this sense that I use the term “global governance” instead of seeing “global” as the arena beyond/outside the State and “governance” as a one-dimensional exercise of authority rather than an interactive one among layers of decision-making. In this chapter, I analyse the older, inherited challenges of global governance to the realization of right to development and emerging new challenges, which have become apparent.
منابع مشابه
A New Gilded Age, and What It Means for Global Health; Comment on “Global Health Governance Challenges 2016 – Are We Ready?”
New contours of global inequality present new challenges for global health, and require that we consider new kinds of health issues as global. I provide a number of illustrations, arguing the need for a political science of health that goes beyond conventional preoccupations with formal institutional and interstate interactions and takes into account how globalization has affected the health po...
متن کاملGlobal Health Governance Challenges 2016 – Are We Ready?
The year 2016 could turn out to be a turning point for global health, new political realities and global insecurities will test governance and financing mechanisms in relation to both people and planet. But most importantly political factors such as the global power shift and “the rise of the rest” will define the future of global health. A new mix of health inequity and security challenges has...
متن کاملChallenges Facing Global Health Networks: The NCD Alliance Experience; Comment on “Four Challenges that Global Health Networks Face”
Successful prevention and control of the epidemic of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) cannot be achieved by the health sector alone: a wide range of organisations from multiple sectors and across government must also be involved. This requires a new, inclusive approach to advocacy and to coordinating, convening and catalysing action across civil society, best achieved by a broad-based network. T...
متن کاملPolycentrism in Global Health Governance Scholarship; Comment on “Four Challenges That Global Health Networks Face”
Drawing on an in-depth analysis of eight global health networks, a recent essay in this journal argued that global health networks face four challenges to their effectiveness: problem definition, positioning, coalition-building, and governance. While sharing the argument of the essay concerned, in this commentary, we argue that these analytical concepts can be used to explicate a concept that h...
متن کاملBusiness as Usual: A Lack of Institutional Innovation in Global Health Governance; Comment on “Global Health Governance Challenges 2016 – Are We Ready?”
There were once again high expectations that a major global health event - the Ebola virus outbreak of 2014-2015 - would trigger meaningfully World Health Organization (WHO) reform and strengthen global health governance (GHG). Rather than a “turning point,” however, the global community has gone back to business as usual. This has occurred against a backdrop of worldwide political turmoil, cha...
متن کاملHistory, Structure and Agency in Global Health Governance; Comment on “Global Health Governance Challenges 2016 – Are We Ready?”
Ilona Kickbusch’s thought provoking editorial is criticized in this commentary, partly because she fails to refer to previous critical work on the global conditions and policies that sustain inequality, poverty, poor health and damage to the biosphere and, as a result, she misreads global power and elides consideration of the fundamental historical structures of political and material power tha...
متن کامل